Peter tweeted that there’s no such thing as UX Design. I agree. I haven’t gone by that label for years, because I don’t think it makes much sense as a title or framing for our work. Nor does it reflect my current interests. I wouldn’t use it in the title of my book were I writing it now. Opinions change; no big deal.
But to be clear, this doesn’t mean I think people who call themselves UX Designers are worthless. Nor does it mean I think their work is worthless. The things UX Designers commonly do are valuable. Please research users. Please prototype. Please test and iterate. [Edit: These activities aren’t the sole domain of designers either – everyone on your team has something to offer here.]
I also think UX people are largely a terrific bunch too: insightful, analytical, strong systems thinkers. Now, I do think most of these folk are too narrow: I want designers who do all that and more. But my complaint is with the label, not the activities. It’s the UX Design label that has little value for me. These activities happen in all good design: if you’re not trying to create positive experience then I don’t really understand what you are doing.
But it’s just words. Just metadata. The output is what matters. So long as you design better technology, I don’t really care what you call yourself.